6. classifying sets of graphs
problemFor each of the following sets of , determine whether it is meager, comeager, or neither, as well as whether it is null, conull, or neither with respect to the fair coin-flip measure.
-
claim
is nowhere dense (and therefore meager).
proofWe wish to show that given any non-empty open set there exists a non-empty open such that . It suffices to show this for just basic open sets, i.e. finitely-determined sets.
Let be finitely-determined. That is to say, membership in depends only on whether a graph contains edges among some fixed finite set . Let be so large that it isn’t incident to any of the edges in ; i.e., membership in doesn’t depend on any edges involving .
Then let , which is non-empty. And notice that no graphs in are bipartite since they contain a triangle (odd cycle).
claimis null.
proofFor each let
and let . Observe that since every bipartite graph must be triangle-free. Also observe that the -th partial intersection has measure
Then . By sending we obtain .
-
claim
is comeager.
proofWe will show that is dense and .
- Dense: Fix any finitely-determined . Let be large enough so that no edges involving affect membership in . Let , and add edges for all to obtain a new graph . Since membership in is unaffected by edges involving , we have that as well. And also is connected because all vertices are adjacent to .
- : For each pair , define By writing observe that is open. And also observe that connectedness means exactly that all pairs of vertices are joined by some path, i.e. .
claimis conull.
proofFix any distinct , and define
Next for every define
Note that , so for all , and therefore .
Meanwhile observe that iff there exist not connected by a path; i.e.,
By countable (sub-)additivity .