Skip to content

topology of π’ž

Denote the Cantor space π’ž={0,1}Nπ’ž=\{0,1\}^β„•.

Definition

For each i∈Niβˆˆβ„•, denote the ii-th projection map Ο€i:π’žβ†’{0,1}Ο€_i:π’žβ†’\{0,1\}, Ο€i(x)=x(i)Ο€_i(x)=x(i).

Definition

The product topology on π’žπ’ž is the smallest topology such that the projection maps are continuous. In particular, since {0,1}\{0,1\} is discrete, we must have that

  • Ο€iβˆ’1({0})={x∈C:x(i)=0}Ο€_i^{-1}(\{0\}) = \{x∈C:x(i)=0\}
  • Ο€iβˆ’1({1})={x∈C:x(i)=1}Ο€_i^{-1}(\{1\}) = \{x∈C:x(i)=1\}

(i.e., sets determined by a single index) are open sets for all i∈Niβˆˆβ„•. This implies also that all finitely-determined sets are open.

Definition

define the normalized Hamming metric on π’žπ’ž by

d(x,y)=βˆ‘i=0∞∣xiβˆ’yi∣2i+1. d(x,y) = βˆ‘_{i=0}^∞ \frac {|xα΅’-yα΅’|} {2ⁱ⁺¹}.
Problem

Is the product topology equivalent to the topology induced by the (normalized) Hamming metric?

Lemma

UU is open in the product topology iff UU is a union of finitely-determined sets.

Proof

Define 𝒯𝒯 to be collection of all unions of finitely-determined sets. Observe that 𝒯𝒯 is a topology:

  • the empty union gives the empty set.
  • the null-determined set (set with no constraints) is all of π’žπ’ž.
  • unions of unions are unions.

Finite intersections: let U=⋃Aβˆˆπ’œAU=⋃_{Aβˆˆπ’œ} A and V=⋃B∈BBV=⋃_{Bβˆˆβ„¬} B, where π’œ,Bπ’œ,ℬ are collections of f.d. sets. Then

U∩V=⋃Aβˆˆπ’œ,B∈BA∩B, U∩V = ⋃_{Aβˆˆπ’œ,Bβˆˆβ„¬} A∩B,

and notice that each A∩BA∩B is still f.d.

Also note that 𝒯𝒯 contains all sets of the form Ο•iβˆ’1(b)ϕᡒ⁻¹(b) since each of these is f.d. So the product topology is a subset of 𝒯𝒯 (by minimality).

So if UU open in the product topology, then UU open in 𝒯𝒯.

Conversely suppose Uβˆˆπ’―Uβˆˆπ’―. Say U=⋃Aβˆˆπ’œAU=⋃_{Aβˆˆπ’œ} A with each AA f.d. Then each AA is a union of (finite intersections of Ο•iβˆ’1({0})ϕᡒ⁻¹(\{0\})s or Ο•iβˆ’1({1})ϕᡒ⁻¹(\{1\})s) and so is open; and UU is an arbitrary union of open sets, which is also open.

Claim

UU is open in the product topology iff it is open under the (normalized) Hamming metric.

Proof
  • [⟹] Suppose UU is open in the product topology. Then U=⋃Aβˆˆπ’œAU=⋃_{Aβˆˆπ’œ} A for some collection of f.d. sets π’œπ’œ.

    We want to show that UU is open under the NH metric; i.e., for all x∈Ux∈U there exists Ο΅>0Ο΅>0 so that BΟ΅(x)βŠ†UB_Ο΅(x)βŠ†U.

    Fix x∈Ux∈U. Then x∈Ax∈A for some f.d. set Aβˆˆπ’œAβˆˆπ’œ. Since AA is finitely-determined, let kk be the last index determining membership in AA. That is, indices above kk don’t matterβ€”for all x,yx,y agreeing on the first kk coordinates, x,yx,y are either both in AA or both not in AA.

    Let Ο΅=1/2k+1Ο΅=1/2ᡏ⁺¹. Suppose y∈BΟ΅(x)y∈B_Ο΅(x). Notice that if xiβ‰ yixα΅’β‰ yα΅’ then d(x,y)β‰₯1/2i+1d(x,y)β‰₯1/2ⁱ⁺¹. So d(x,y)<1/2kd(x,y)<1/2ᡏ ensures that xx and yy agree on (at least) the first kk digits. So then the fact that x∈Ax∈A implies y∈Ay∈A as well, and AβŠ†UAβŠ†U implies y∈Uy∈U also. Thus BΟ΅(x)βŠ†UB_Ο΅(x)βŠ†U.

  • [⟸] Conversely, suppose UU is open under NH metric.

    We want to show that UU is open under product topology.

    Fix x∈Ux∈U, and by metric-openness there exists Ο΅>0Ο΅>0 such that BΟ΅(x)βŠ†UB_Ο΅(x)βŠ†U. Let k∈Nkβˆˆβ„• so that 1/2k≀ϡ1/2ᡏ≀ϡ. Let Bβ€²B' be the set of all strings agreeing with xx on (at least) the first kk digits. Then if y∈Bβ€²y∈B',

    d(x,y)β‰€βˆ‘i=k+1∞12i+1≀12k+1<ϡ⟹y∈BΟ΅(x). d(x,y) ≀ βˆ‘_{i=k+1}^∞ \frac 1 {2^{i+1}} ≀ \frac 1 {2^{k+1}} < Ο΅ \qquad⟹\qquad y∈B_Ο΅(x).

    Thus Bβ€²βŠ†BΟ΅(x)B'βŠ†B_Ο΅(x). Also note that Bβ€²B' is f.d., so Bβ€²B' is open in the product topology.

    In particular we just established that for each x∈Ux∈U, there exists a Bβ€²(x)βŠ†UB'(x)βŠ†U such Bβ€²(x)B'(x) is open in the product topology. Then U=β‹‚x∈UBβ€²(x)U=β‹‚_{x∈U} B'(x), and furthermore this establishes that UU is open in the product topology.